The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: Worlds Shaped by Words
Miller describes two modes for the relationship between language and culture. What are they? SapirWhorf hypothesis a perspective in linguistic anthropology which says that language determines thought. Another way to understand relationships between language and culture comes from scholars in the area of sociolinguistics. It emphasizes how people's cultural and social context shape their languages and its meanings.
Give two examples from the Thomson article that reflect how grammar can shape the perceptions of people in a specific culture? A few example from the text is how the speakers of Shona have only three words for the color spectrum. Bassa speakers only have two words. This in terms would make it difficult for them to try to describe the many other colors that are not in their language. It would be hard to describe in their culture the many colors that of the English language has. Their perceptions of this does change and effect how anyone views the world because one’s vocabulary is limited.
Provide two examples of ways in which language affects thought from your own experience? Persuasion would be a way that can effect anyone’s thoughts and experience. As we see commercials or billboards it has dawned on me how subliminal messages can influence anyone and everyone in their language and culture, getting them to spend their money on either new trends or just cause it may seem like a very good deal. When we see the McDonald arches one can’t help but think about the taste, menu and at times low prices. I also have experienced how the Laws of the land can be very vague or use other terms to cloud one’s mind. It makes some people frustrated due to the language that they speak on a day to day basis in that career field. It varies from any occupation from lawyers to brokers using grammar that can be used to confuse the individual if that person has never heard of those terms that are used by that individuals...