For God I live and For God I die
Life is a precious gift that is to be received from God with gratefulness. It should be cherished, well-kept, and improved in every way possible. But when the potential for meaningful, joyful, desirable life has been painstakingly drained and every effort made to prevent the inevitable, should we make it possible for the compassionate to show mercy to the dying that makes an appeal for intervention to end their suffering? This essay will explore the topic of assisted suicide. A look at the paper wrote by Wolf will be examined and contrasted. My view against assisted suicide will be fore told end with a comparison on why people are for it.
Assisted suicide is the actions by which an individual helps another person of their own free will bring about his or her own death. "Assistance may mean providing one with the means (drugs or equipment) to end one's own life, but may extend to other actions” (Dekay, 1997). It differs to euthanasia where another person ends the life. Assisted suicide is most widely defined as a type of active euthanasia in which a doctor provides the means of death usually by prescribing a lethal dose of drugs but the patient is responsible for performing the final act. Worldwide public debates have been ongoing for years, concentrating on legal, religious, and moral conceptions of suicide and a personal right to death. The practice may be legal, illegal, or undecided depending on the culture or jurisdiction. “Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering” (Davidson, 1979).
Susan Wolf’s Story
This article narrates Wolf’s scuffle with her dying father’s request to hasten his death. After termination of artificial nutrition and hydration, he asks, in effect, for physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia. Wolf initially declines. But her commitment to her father forces her to reconsider her position. “My father’s death forced...